The Batwise Framework
A comprehensive methodology for measuring and improving your brand's visibility across AI search platforms
As AI-powered search becomes the default way people discover brands and make purchase decisions, visibility in traditional search engines is no longer enough. The Batwise Framework provides a structured, data-driven methodology to measure, benchmark, and improve how AI models perceive, cite, and recommend your brand.
The framework is built around 5 pillars — each representing a critical dimension of AI visibility. Together, they form the foundation of the Batwise Visibility Score (BVS), a composite metric that quantifies your brand's presence across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and Google AI Overviews.
Citations
How often AI models mention your brand
Citations measure how frequently AI models reference your brand when answering queries relevant to your market. This pillar distinguishes between inline citations (direct links that drive traffic) and content sources (materials the AI consulted but didn't explicitly link to).
A critical concept within this pillar is the source gap — domains and publications that cite your competitors but not you. Identifying and closing source gaps is one of the highest-leverage activities for improving AI visibility, because it directly targets the information ecosystem that AI models draw from.
Key Metrics
How to Improve
- Identify source gaps — publications citing competitors but not you — and pitch them
- Create comprehensive, linkable content that AI models want to reference
- Ensure your brand appears in industry directories, listicles, and comparison articles
- Build a consistent publishing cadence to maintain citation freshness
- Monitor which competitors are gaining citations and analyze their strategies
Content Readiness
How well-structured your content is for AI consumption
Content Readiness evaluates whether your website's content is structured in a way that AI models can easily parse, understand, and extract answers from. Even brands with strong authority and citations can underperform in AI search if their content isn't formatted for machine consumption.
This pillar goes beyond traditional SEO content optimization. It measures schema coverage (how much of your content uses structured data), answer density (how directly your content answers common questions), and FAQ coverage (whether you address the queries your audience is asking AI platforms).
Key Metrics
How to Improve
- Implement comprehensive Schema.org markup (Article, FAQ, HowTo, Product)
- Structure content with clear headings, lists, and direct answer formats
- Add FAQ sections that mirror how users ask questions to AI platforms
- Write concise, definitive answers in the first paragraph of each section
- Regularly update content to maintain freshness signals for AI models
Technical Health
How accessible your content is to AI crawlers
Technical Health assesses the infrastructure-level factors that determine whether AI models and their crawlers can access, index, and process your content. If your site is slow, blocks crawlers, or has broken structured data, even the best content won't reach AI models.
This pillar covers crawlability (can AI bots reach your pages), page speed (do pages load fast enough for efficient crawling), sitemap health (is your content properly mapped), and structured data validity (does your markup parse without errors).
Key Metrics
How to Improve
- Audit robots.txt to ensure AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, etc.) are not blocked
- Optimize Core Web Vitals — LCP, FID, and CLS — across all pages
- Maintain a complete, auto-updating XML sitemap submitted to search consoles
- Validate all structured data with Google's Rich Results Test
- Ensure every page renders correctly without JavaScript dependency for crawlers
Competitive Position
How you compare to competitors in AI search
Competitive Position measures your brand's standing relative to competitors across AI search platforms. It's not enough to improve in isolation — you need to understand where competitors beat you, on which models, and for which queries.
This pillar tracks your share of voice (what percentage of relevant AI answers mention your brand vs. competitors), head-to-head comparisons (when users ask AI to compare brands, who wins), recommendation frequency (how often AI explicitly recommends each brand), and growth rate (who is gaining or losing visibility over time).
Key Metrics
How to Improve
- Monitor competitor visibility weekly and identify emerging threats
- Analyze which content and sources are driving competitor citations
- Target queries where competitors appear but you don't
- Track share of voice per AI model to spot platform-specific opportunities
- Invest in differentiating content that gives AI models a reason to recommend you
The Batwise Framework isn't just a measurement tool — it's a strategic roadmap for AI visibility. By systematically improving across all five pillars, brands can move from invisible to indispensable in AI search.
Each pillar reinforces the others: strong authority leads to more citations, quality content improves technical signals, and competitive awareness drives targeted improvements. The brands that win in AI search will be those that treat AI visibility as a continuous discipline, not a one-time project.
Ready to see where your brand stands? Get your Batwise Visibility Score and start optimizing across all five pillars today.
